#PMDG 777 FUEL PLANNER MANUAL#
#PMDG 777 FUEL PLANNER CODE#

In the past I have used the data/fuel logger in hopes that the aircraft would get added, do I need to post here every time I fly an aircraft that isn't on the list yet? How do I get access to the advanced options and what are they? How do I go about getting additional aircraft added to the system? I fly almost exclusively Military in FSX. Moreover, would it be possible to have the option to adjust ZFW with ZFW input, instead of only being able to input OEW or TTL? It would be appreciated, because many VAs give a ZFW when assigning a flight.

#PMDG 777 FUEL PLANNER CODE#

Johannesburg icao code needs updating its FAOR but on here it is FAJRДЄdding burn data (using the client) for the IRIS Easter Egg 2014 Global Express XRS. (like what just happened in France), the overhead will be massive and the actual route distance will be much bigger than the great circle distance, and fuel indication will be less than needed. This is not critical when the overhead is small (usual situation), but in cases like ATC strikes, mandatory re-routings, and etc.

If there's such an input by the person planning, it would override the value calculated automatically, if there's no input, the calculator will assume the self calculated great circle distance.Д«y adding this, planners would be able to calculate more precise flight times (and consequent fuel burns) considering their own specific routings.

#PMDG 777 FUEL PLANNER MANUAL#

This simple (I believe) input would be done by having a field in the calculator for Manual Distance input. Thanks for the great site!! Much helpful and look forward to many upgrades in the future.ДЄnother interesting function would be the possibility to input a specific number of NM for the fuel calculator to base its calculations, in addition to the grand circle distance calculated automatically by the system. Thank you so much for the site but if possible could you add the QW757-300. What is needed to add a new plane to the list? I have some specs data for this plane (used in GoodWay flight planner). I intend to use it for re-enacting Super-Constellation flights, but this plane is not on the list. I am using Fuelplanner through the site, to compute routes and fuel burns to use in x-plane 10.25. My pilots in the Atlantic Canada Air VA also use this site which is linked on our procedures page at /index.html Have been using fuel planner for some time now. Is it possible that you add the PMDG 777-200? :) Max 26,200 that all.ДЄwesome very accurate most times would like to see WIlco Airbus 380-800 on the list the one in there 380-100 calculations are a bit off (Not enough fuel as calculated). There Douglas DC-3 Loadsheet must be wrong weights? Not that MAX 2600 too much over than 26,200, as never heard that. Has the weight allowance per passenger increased since the year 2000? If so, does anyone hold any stats relating to this? Thank you!Дouglas DC-3 follow that gross weight: 26,200 lb / 11,884 kg in MSFS only. Hi all, I'm hoping someone can assist me as the contact link for this website doesn't seem to work. Hope this helps anyone who feels they can't get the right bias for the PMDG aircraft.Comments and Feedback Comments from registered users:Дanni - no it hasn't changed. This method is a little cruder, but it has served me well for a long time with some aircraft. Because the ISA deviation was positive, you will burn more fuel. if the average ISA deviation is +6, you would get 6/10 = 0.6. Or - you can look at the average ISA deviation for the flight, and change the bias accordingly, i.e.

You can post if you need help with this in this post. Now, if you can edit the aircraft files - I would suggest removing any reference to added/decreased fuel burn for ISA deviation.

All reference the default profiles, which are good profiles: Here are some figures for bias to start with that I have obtained by flying the aircraft at different weights in different ISA conditions, and measuring fuel burn (if you're interested in the method, I'll detail that later). Or adjust by average on a per flight basis. If you can edit the aircraft file, remove any reference to the increase/decreased burn in varying ISA conditions. In the meantime, I hope this might help a couple of people who might be frustrated by not being able to find a good 'bias' number. PMDG have been notified and are looking into the problem.

I have conducted some statistical analysis on all PMDG aircraft - none of them increase fuel burn 3% per 10 degree ISA increase, and none of them have decreased fuel burn for the reverse.

Pmdg 777 fuel planner